Way back before the XF 10-24mm F/4 OIS was announced, the wide to ultra-wide focal range was what I was most concerned about missing when I switched from Nikon to Fuji. The XF 14mm F/2.8 more than satisfied my needs at 21mm, but at the time, I was really into going wider.

I had a brief opportunity to test out the XF 10-24mm F/4 OIS, and post my impressions. You can read my pre-production impressions here, but as a review, they were rather hopelessly out of date.

The XF 10-24mm F/4 OIS was a hotly anticipated lens for me, though my excitement was tempered before the official release by the lens’s lack of weather sealing. It held up in the cold just fine, but water and dust are another matter.

In the years since, I’ve made reasonably good use of the XF 10-24mm F/4 OIS, and put it through its paces against a bunch of lenses in its range. Here’s my review.



Lens Construction 14 elements in 10 groups
(4 aspherical elements, 3 extra low dispersion elements)
Focal Length (35mm format equivalent) 10-24mm (15-36mm)
Maximum Aperture/Range f/4 ⅓ stop increments
Aperture Type 7 blades (rounded diaphragm opening)
Focus Range Approximately 24cm - ∞ (infinity)
Maximum Magnification 0.16×
External Dimensions 78mm diameter x 87mm long
Weight 405g
456g w caps and hood
Filter Size ø72mm


Weather Sealing No
Optical Image Stabilization (OIS) Yes
(2.5 stop claimed)
Focus Motor Stepping
Push/Pull Clutch Manual Focus Ring No
Nano GI Coating No
Fluorine Coating No


Build Quality

If you’ve handled the XF 18-55mm F/2.8-4 OIS (Review), you will be right at home with the XF 10-24mm F/4 OIS. The inner-most ring which controls the aperture has the exact same feel, while the zoom ring is a little stiffer. Whether or not this is better will come down to preference.

The zoom ring has a similar amount of mild roughness to it. It’s very faint, but noticeable relative to the focus ring and should be considered normal. This was Fuji’s first rubberized zoom ring. In room temperature, I prefer the metal zoom ring. I find my grip is more sure with the metal knurled rings and I just love the feel of them. They ooze quality.

The lens barrel has markings for 10, 14, 18, 20, and 24mm in very short rotation. This makes zooming from one end of the range to the other quick, but it can make dialing in a specific focal length rather challenging. The front moves in and out slightly when zooming.

Finally, the focus ring also feels just like the split focus ring on the kit lens. Nice and smooth.

Aperture Ring

That the aperture ring on the XF 10-24mm F/4 OIS is the same as the kit lens is a bit of mystery to me. See, the XF 18-55mm F/2.8-4 OIS has a variable aperture, which makes an engraved aperture ring impossible. The XF 10-24mm F/4 OIS, on the other hand, is a fixed f/4 aperture, and really should have the same sort of aperture ring as the XF 16-55mm F/2.8 WR. This makes quick confirmation of ones aperture a little more effort on all but X-H bodies.

Also like the kit lens, the XF 10-24mm F/4 OIS includes an A Switch to access Shutter Speed priority, and have the camera choose the aperture for you, or set the Shutter Speed to A as well for Program Auto mode.



The XF 10-24mm F/4 OIS lacks the linear motors of larger lenses, but still manages reasonably snappy autofocus with its Stepping Motor,1 and by only moving the smaller rear elements of the lens during focus. The elements on wider lenses also typically have much less distance to travel to get focused.

Optical Image Stabilization (OIS)

That Stepping Motor mentioned above also seems to play a role in how effective OIS is. Linear Motor lenses like the XF 18-55mm F/2.8-4 OIS have a claimed OIS of at least 3.5 stops whereas the XF 10-24mm F/4 OIS ekes out a mere 2.5.

Getting sharp images handheld tends to get easier the wider the focal length, so shutter speeds down to ⅛ of a second are possible.

Do keep in mind that maximum sharpness is achieved with OIS off so all you tripod shooters will want to shoot unstabilized as far as the lens goes.

Size and Weight

While the XF 10-24mm F/4 OIS is considerably smaller than a DSLR equivalent, it’s still quite a bit larger than the primes covered by the focal range. The only lens that could leave question is the XF 16mm F/1.4 WR, Fuji’s heftiest wide angle prime. Back to the zoom, it balances very well on Fuji’s larger cameras like the X-Pro, X-T, and X-H, but can get a little front heavy on smaller bodies like the X-E and X-Txx bodies.


A now standard2 plastic hood ships with the XF 10-24mm F/4 OIS. It’s not terribly long, but it does add considerable width to the lens, which can make it difficult to fit in bags, even with the hood reversed. Since I am often interested in using filters with this lens, I rarely bother with the hood.

Lens Cap

I swapped the cap that shipped with my XF 10-24mm F/4 OIS for a Nikon LC-72→. I’d buy Fuji’s superior 72mm cap that ships with the XF 50-140mm F/2.8 WR, but it doesn’t seems to be available as an aftermarket purchase.

Optical Viewfinder

Sadly, you can pretty much forget it. Wider than 18mm leaves part of your composition outside the frame, and even when it’s not, the lens is so large it obstruct for too much of the viewfinder to be usable.

Image Quality


The XF 10-24mm F/4 OIS performs admirably in the sharpness department. While this isn’t a Versus piece, it’s tough not to draw some comparison with prime alternatives in the range. The summery is the zoom performs almost as well as the primes at the wider end, as good or better at 18mm, and quite a bit worse at the narrow end of the range.

For those interested in much more in depth comparison and analysis between this zoom and primes in its range, check out my XF 10-24mm F/4 OIS vs. Primes piece. All primes are included with the exception of the XF 16mm F/1.4 WR for which you can find a review here, and an in depth comparison with two of the other primes compared in the article above, here.


You’re likely not buying this lens for the bokeh, and at f/4 expectations ought to be managed, but some decent bokeh can’t be rendered when focusing closely enough with the lens wide open. Keep in mind this is the softest focal length shot at the softest aperture, so the worst of the worst the lens is capable of in terms of sharpness.

In short, if bokeh’s your game, this lens isn’t.


Heavy barrel on the wide end, switching to not quite as heavy pincushion zoomed in when shooting RAFs. The transition seems to be somewhere between 14 and 18mm. 14mm is about the point of least distortion and it is quite minimal.

When correction profiles are applied, distortion can almost safely be ignored. I’ve used this lens successfully for real estate and architecture photography, and I know of at least one person who actually became a real estate agent after using this lens to capture real estate photos. You can perhaps do a little better using primes, but switching lenses in these situations can quickly grow tiresome.


Heavy at maximum width, moderate to light at all other focal lengths, and never entirely goes away. Stopping down couple times will net you the most consistently exposed frame.


For such a wide angle, flare and ghosting is remarkably well controlled. Flare and ghosting is possible, but is typically not a nuisance. Typically. There’s a good example of some nuisance flare in the samples below.


Like distortion, if your editing software reads correction profiles, aberrations may never be of any concern. Likewise for JPEG shooters. It does exists in small amounts particularly towards the edges of the frame at wider apertures.

Conclusion and Rating

The XF 10-24mm F/4 OIS is an excellent lens, but because of the lack of weather sealing, it’s a lens that gets left behind far more often than I’d like. My wide angle enthusiasm has shifted heavily towards the XF 8-16mm F/2.8 WR because of this. I would advise my readers either hold off on the purchase of a wide angle zoom until the XF 8-16mm F/2.8 WR’s release, or buy an XF 10-24mm F/4 OIS with the potential of selling it to fund the purchase of the weather sealed zoom, should that be important.

For those who weather sealing is unimportant, I can recommend it strongly with the proviso that 24mm may not meet the needs of the fussy. I’m happy to grab a happy snap on vacation, but if I were closing in on 23mm with my camera mounted on a tripod for a landscape shot, I would want to change my lens if possible.

Recommended for good weather

  1. The kind of focusing motor that doesn’t get its initials added to a lenses official product name. ↩︎
  2. Since Fuji’s first 3 lenses, the XF 18mm F/2, XF 35mm F/1.4, and XF 60mm F/2.4 Macro, which all shipped with metal hoods, and a positively sublime unboxing experience. ↩︎

If you’d like to purchase the XF 10-24mm F/4 OIS, or anything else for that matter please consider using one of the affiliate links below. The price is the same for you, but a small percentage of the purchase price goes to me, which helps keep this site going. Thank you.

 Any narrower and I wouldn’t have been able to get both sides of this small inlet 

Any narrower and I wouldn’t have been able to get both sides of this small inlet 

 Jam an ultra-wide angle lens ina wire basket full of gas masks and you’re sure to get an interesting image

Jam an ultra-wide angle lens ina wire basket full of gas masks and you’re sure to get an interesting image

 Street Photography at angels this wide can make the viewer feel like they were there with you

Street Photography at angels this wide can make the viewer feel like they were there with you

 Luckily, I spotted the tripod leg that had sneaked into my composition before releasing the shutter

Luckily, I spotted the tripod leg that had sneaked into my composition before releasing the shutter

DSCF4103-XF10-24mmF4 R OIS-10 mm-1-30 sec at f - 4.0.jpg