It’s turned out to be a big week for Fuji fans. After the XF10→ fake out yesterday, Fuji dropped official announcements for two new lenses, and unveiled the latest X Mount roadmap including 3 more new lenses.
The X70 just sort of disappeared from store shelves a while back. I didn’t even know it was gone. I reviewed the X70 a couple years ago, but it failed to recapture the magic of the X100. It might have been a little bit too early to the market in some ways. Connectivity wasn’t seamless enough, and the 16MP sensor may not have been compelling enough a spec to lure smartphone shooters, X Trans or not. Fuji is hoping their new connectivity and 24.2MP sensor will turn more heads, but they’ve made some curious choices. The flip up screen is a feature I don’t think they should have omitted, but if it gets the cost down low enough, maybe that will make the difference. The XF10 weighs in at just 280g, 66.5 grams less than the X70. I expect this camera will do much better in Asian market than Western, but I’m still not expecting it to set the photography world on fire.
XF 8-16mm F/2.8 WR
We’ve likely all known this was coming, but it’s nice to get some official details including estimated release date and pricing. The XF 8-16mm F/2.8 WR→ will cost a nickel under $2,000 when it is released in late November. Cripes. That’s a lotta dough. As I quipped on Twitter, this thing better be absolutely stellar to justify that kind of price.
It’s also big. And heavy. 150 grams heavier than the XF 16-55mm F/2.8 WR,→ which is already pretty hefty. Fuji themselves call this lens “Monster Glass.” They’re not wrong, but it is still a couple hundred grams less than full frame equivalents.
Add to its size and weight that it lacks OIS, and this lens sort of demands to be mounted on an X-H1, much like the XF 16-55mm F/2.8 WR.
Using filters with the XF 8-16mm F/2.8 WR is going to be rough. No rear insert like what Canon has. I don’t yet know if the front elements moves at all, but it would have been super cool if Fuji could have figured out a way to add a filter thread to this lens. It would have been a unique selling feature for a lens this wide.
XF 200mm F/2 OIS WR
Fuji might be aping Canon with the colour, but no matter. The XF 200mm F/2 OIS WR→ looks awesome. It’s another monster though, size weight, and price, all sky high. Should the day arrive that I want to shoot wildlife again, this is the lens I’m starting to save up for now.
I love that it includes the 1.4× teleconverter,1 but the somewhat, if not totally legendary Nikon 200mm f/2 can be had with a 1.4× teleconverter for just $100 more. That lens covers full frame sensors as well.
I hope the tripod collar is a little more solid than the one than ships with the XF 50-140mm F/2.8 WR. Mine is prone to flex.
By the way, you see the hood? That green just screams Classic Fujifilm.
XF 33mm F/1 WR
Considering it isn’t due to hit store shelves until around 2020, it might be a bit premature for Fuji to shout “world’s first mirrorless lens with an F/1 maximum aperture,” but man, do I ever want one. Judging by the Roadmap image, it looks like it will be too large to completely supplant my XF 35mm F/2 WR, but it’s an eff one point zero. ’Nuff said.
XF 16mm F/2.8 WR
A new entry into the F2WR line of lenses that doesn’t quite make it to F/2, sadly. This lens will have to be much smaller, lighter, and less expensive than the outstanding XF 16mm F/1.4 WR for it to be a consideration. Given the previous F2WR’s, chances are good it will be all three.
XF 16-80mm F/4 OIS WR
This lens has “travel” written all over it. Maybe even more than the XF 18-135mm F/3.5-5.6 WR, which has always left me unsatisfied, optically. This lens should replace the XF 18-55mm F/2.8-4 OIS as the kit lens for any weather sealed bodies, but it’s been categorized it as “Red Badge,” so that could be unlikely.
It will be nice to have the choice between and extra stop or 25mm more reach, but I always have a hard time turning down light gathering.
Lots of cool stuff coming from Fuji over the next little while. Personally, I’m most interested in the XF 33mm F/1 R, and if my Twitter replies are any indication, most of you are as well, with the XF 16-80 F/4 OIS WR coming in a close second.
- Don’t let the tricky language mislead you though, when they say “supporting the lens’s maximum aperture of F/2” they don’t mean the f-stop value remains constant. They note that in the legal copy, but I still find the language misleading. ↩︎